Pages

24 August 2009

Mammography

The invention: The first X-ray procedure for detecting and diagnosing breast cancer. The people behind the invention: Albert Salomon, the first researcher to use X-ray technology instead of surgery to identify breast cancer Jacob Gershon-Cohen (1899-1971), a breast cancer researcher Studying Breast Cancer Medical researchers have been studying breast cancer for more than a century. At the end of the nineteenth century, however, no one knew how to detect breast cancer until it was quite advanced. Often, by the time it was detected, it was too late for surgery; many patients who did have surgery died. So after X-ray technology first appeared in 1896, cancer researchers were eager to experiment with it. The first scientist to use X-ray techniques in breast cancer experiments was Albert Salomon, a German surgeon. Trying to develop a biopsy technique that could tell which tumors were cancerous and thereby avoid unnecessary surgery, he X-rayed more than three thousand breasts that had been removed from patients during breast cancer surgery. In 1913, he published the results of his experiments, showing that X rays could detect breast cancer. Different types of Xray images, he said, showed different types of cancer. Though Salomon is recognized as the inventor of breast radiology, he never actually used his technique to diagnose breast cancer. In fact, breast cancer radiology, which came to be known as “mammography,” was not taken up quickly by other medical researchers. Those who did try to reproduce his research often found that their results were not conclusive. During the 1920’s, however, more research was conducted in Leipzig, Germany, and in South America. Eventually, the Leipzig researchers, led by Erwin Payr, began to use mammography to diagnose cancer. In the 1930’s, a Leipzig researcher named W. Vogel published a paper that accurately described differences between cancerous and noncancerous tumors as they appeared on X-ray photographs. Researchers in the United States paid little attention to mammography until 1926. That year, a physician in Rochester, New York, was using a fluoroscope to examine heart muscle in a patient and discovered that the fluoroscope could be used to make images of breast tissue as well. The physician, Stafford L. Warren, then developed a stereoscopic technique that he used in examinations before surgery. Warren published his findings in 1930; his article also described changes in breast tissue that occurred because of pregnancy, lactation (milk production), menstruation, and breast disease. Yet Stafford’s technique was complicated and required equipment that most physicians of the time did not have. Eventually, he lost interest in mammography and went on to other research. Using the Technique In the late 1930’s, Jacob Gershon-Cohen became the first clinician to advocate regular mammography for all women to detect breast cancer before it became a major problem. Mammography was not very expensive, he pointed out, and it was already quite accurate. A milestone in breast cancer research came in 1956, when Gershon- Cohen and others began a five-year study of more than 1,300 women to test the accuracy of mammography for detecting breast cancer. Each woman studied was screened once every six months. Of the 1,055 women who finished the study, 92 were diagnosed with benign tumors and 23 with malignant tumors. Remarkably, out of all these, only one diagnosis turned out to be wrong. During the same period, Robert Egan of Houston began tracking breast cancer X rays. Over a span of three years, one thousand X-ray photographs were used to make diagnoses. When these diagnoses were compared to the results of surgical biopsies, it was confirmed that mammography had produced 238 correct diagnoses of cancer, out of 240 cases. Egan therefore joined the crusade for regular breast cancer screening. Once mammography was finally accepted by doctors in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s, researchers realized that they needed a way to teach mammography quickly and effectively to those who would use it. A study was done, and it showed that any radiologist could conduct the procedure with only five days of training.In the early 1970’s, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute joined forces on a nationwide breast cancer screening program called the “Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project.” Its goal in 1971 was to screen more than 250,000 women over the age of thirty-five. Since the 1960’s, however, some people had argued that mammography was dangerous because it used radiation on patients. In 1976, Ralph Nader, a consumer advocate, stated that women who were to undergo mammography should be given consent forms that would list the dangers of radiation. In the years that followed, mammography was refined to reduced the amount of radiation needed to detect cancer. It became a standard tool for diagnosis, and doctors recommended that women have a mammogram every two or three years after the age of forty. Impact Radiology is not a science that concerns only breast cancer screening. While it does provide the technical facilities necessary to practice mammography, the photographic images obtained must be interpreted by general practitioners, as well as by specialists. Once Gershon-Cohen had demonstrated the viability of the technique, a means of training was devised that made it fairly easy for clinicians to learn how to practice mammography successfully. Once all these factors—accuracy, safety, simplicity—were in place, mammography became an important factor in the fight against breast cancer. The progress made in mammography during the twentieth century was a major improvement in the effort to keep more women from dying of breast cancer. The disease has always been one of the primary contributors to the number of female cancer deaths that occur annually in the United States and around the world. This high figure stems from the fact that women had no way of detecting the disease until tumors were in an advanced state. Once Salomon’s procedure was utilized, physicians had a means by which they could look inside breast tissue without engaging in exploratory surgery, thus giving women a screening technique that was simple and inexpensive. By 1971, a quarter million women over age thirty-five had been screened. Twenty years later, that number was in the millions.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

The statement "Once all these factors—accuracy, safety, simplicity—were in place, mammography became an important factor in the fight against breast cancer." is scientifically incorrect because it had been known since the 1950s that low dose medical x rays cause cancer and other studies in the 60s/70s found they especially cause breast cancer, and therefore mammography "safety" has never been "in place" -including today ( see Rolf Hefti (e)book "The Mammogram Myth" - more at http://www.supplements-and-health.com/mammograms.html ). But medical dogma and large vested interests made the irrefutable evidence of cancer-causing causality of mammogram irradiation to get overlooked and downplayed -including today.

Anonymous said...

When I initially commented I clicked the "Notify me when new comments are added" checkbox and
now each time a comment is added I get several e-mails with
the same comment. Is there any way you can remove people from that service?
Thanks!

Also visit my web blog; periodontics

AIR FORCE BRAT JAPAN 1957 said...

HALLELUYAH! FINALLY SOMEONE WITH BRAINS! I DID THOSE TORTURE TESTS FOR TWO YEARS THEN DECIDED "IF THIS WAS THE INQUISITION IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED TORTURE." MY DOCTOR FINALLY STOPPED BUGGING ME ABOUT GETTING ANOTHER ONE.
THOSE TORTURE DEVICES, BESIDES CAUSING CANCER, ARE JUST NOT THE WAY TO TEST WOMEN AND MEN FOR BREAST CANCER.
IF MEN CAN HAVE A SIMPLE BLOOD TEST TO SEE IF THEY HAVE PROSTRATE CANCER WHY CAN'T SOMEONE INVENT A LESS OBTRUSIVE TEST FOR BREAST CANCER?
YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD WITH YOUR COMMENT "MEDICAL DOGMA AND LARGE VESTED INTERESTS" ARE A MAJOR FACTOR IN THE CONTINUING TORTURE.
THANK YOU FOR YOU FOR SPEAKING OUT TRUTHFULLY AND CANDIDLY.
AIR FORCE BRAT JAPAN 1957

Unknown said...

zhengjx20160317
coach outlet online
coach outlet
jimmy choo
michael kors uk
reebok classic
nike tn pas cher
michael kors outlet online
cheap ray ban sunglasses
valentino bags
toms outlet
cartier love ring
coach outlet store online
michael kors handbags
michael kors outlet
coach factory outlet
michael kors handbags
ralph lauren
hollister hoodies
coach outlet online
burberry outlet
nike running shoes
longchamp bags
ray ban sunglasses
babyliss
fitflops outlet
ralph lauren sale
canada goose sale
toms shoes
hermes outlet
versace sunglasses
supra
timberland boots
prada handbags
christian louboutin shoes
cheap basketball shoes
michael kors bags
ture religion outlet
ray bans
ghd hair dryer
discount oakley sunglasses

chenmeinv0 said...

oakley canada
cheap ugg boots
moncler coats
ugg boots
canada goose outlet
tory burch sale
cheap ray ban sunglasses
gucci belts
michael kors outlet online
oakley sunglasses
2016.11.26xukaimin

DNA Testing said...

This posting is beautifully explained regards the topic and thanks to u for posting this information and the way it explain clearly is so nice. Hopefully it must be very necessay for people and help them......